Before you panic, take the word of a physicist who conducted a similar study several years ago: He says HIP 85605 is nothing to lose sleep over in the foreseeable future.
"It's important for astronomers to be leading the way in terms of identifying the risks that things in outer space may hold for us," Rider University's John Bochanski told NBC News on Wednesday. "But as for this particular star wiping out humanity? I would probably bet against it."
The answer to the question was 42.
Out of those 42 alien suns, HIP 85605 appeared likely to have the closest encounter. Today the star is 4.9 parsecs (16 light-years) away, but hundreds of thousands of years from now, it's judged to have a 90 percent probability of passing through at a distance of 0.04 to 0.2 parsecs (767 billion to 3.8 trillion miles).
That may not sound all that close, but it's close enough to disrupt the vast repository of comets in the solar system's Oort Cloud, which is thought to extend about 0.5 parsecs (1.6 light-years) from the sun. "That would really tear it up, and I'm guessing you would have a pretty big comet shower, potentially pretty disastrous," Adrian Melott, a physicist at the University of Kansas, told NBC News.
Although it's hard to assess comet threats vs. asteroid threats, it's thought that comets have rained down destruction on our planet in the past. "It has been argued that as you go up in size in impacts, the bigger they are, the more likely they are to have been caused by a comet," Melott said. "The whole thing is fairly scary."
Astronomers say there's ample evidence that previous encounters with passing stars have shaped our solar system. For example, a close encounter of the stellar kind is one of the best ways to explain why potential dwarf planets such as Sedna and 2012 VP113 (known unofficially as Biden) circle the sun in weird, far-out orbits.
But even Bailer-Jones acknowledges that observational uncertainties and inaccuracies in the Hipparchos data could throw off his analysis. Other experts are even more circumspect.
"The predictions are quite reasonable, but I would say they have large error bars because of our imperfect knowledge of the parameters at this time," Melott said.
David Morrison, an astronomer who specializes in cosmic risk assessment at NASA's Ames Research Center, told NBC News in an email that Bailer-Jones' study was "really quite awesome," but he added a cautionary note: "I respect the many caveats about the inability with present data to make specific predictions. ... To me the message of this paper is the amount of data and computing power we now have, but not any specific prediction."
Bailer-Jones said the European Space Agency's Gaia probe, which was launched a year ago, should provide much more accurate data about the positions and velocities of the stellar passers-by. "In some sense, the paper is an advertisement for Gaia," Melott joked.